Pc cases - 16'928 items found
REPEAT/The Law Firm of Goldman Scarlato & Karon, P.C. Files Consumer Class ...
31.03.10
CLEVELAND, Mar 31, 2010 (BUSINESS WIRE) --
Goldman Scarlato & Karon, P.C., a law firm with offices in Cleveland, OH
and Conshohocken, PA, has filed a consumer class-action lawsuit against
Verizon Wireless in federal court in New Jersey. This lawsuit claims
that Verizon charged its non-smartphone customers for data service that
these customers never used. Verizon's allegedly improper data-service
charges oftentimes appeared $1.99 at a time, and this lawsuit strives to
reimburse people and businesses should it turn out that these charges
were improper. If you believe Verizon charged you for data service that it shouldn't
have and would like to see a copy of this lawsuit, please e-mail us at karon@gsk-law.com.
Or if you'd like to learn more about this lawsuit, we invite you to call
Daniel Karon at (216) 622-1851.
Source: MarketWatch (press release)
Jury System Reform in Personal Injury Cases
Jury System Reform in Personal Injury Cases
Civil juries have been called the conscience of the community. John Stuart Mill once observed that the jury system is “at the very heart of democracy Similarly, Alexis De Tocqueville stated that the American civil jury system is “one of the most efficacious means for the education of the people which society can employ.” Those fighting for the rights of the people, namely Personal Injury Lawyers in Wrongful Death, Birth Injury, Brain Damage, Medical Malpractice, Truck Accident an similar cases, have long fought for strengthening the jury system.Β The right to a trial by jury in civil cases is firmly embedded in the United States Constitution, as well as most state constitutions. The Seventh Amendment provides: “In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.” And the United States Supreme Court has held that “[m]aintenance of the jury as a fact-finding body is of such importance and occupies so firm a place in our history and jurisprudence that any seeming curtailment of the right to a jury trial should be scrutinized with utmost care.” ...
Read more...

|
 |
-
Twitter
Apr 03, 2010 from Patrick Baty

Miles walked 19; photographs taken 120; breakfasts eaten 1; card cases bought 2; monocles tried 5; PC monitors bought 1; scruffy BG seen 1.
|